08 June, 08:56
🇺🇸 Juan O Savin
In the occult, in witchcraft, in sorcery,
the maximum magnification of a spell is 3 times.
So the witch turns 3 times in the circle to get
the maximum magnification of a spell
or a something that they’re doing.
When the people go into the House of Commons in Europe
& they want to go into the bench & present
they knock 3 times on the door,
& the judge pounds the gavel 3 times.
It’s this magic spell magnification.
When you think of 17 here in America
which is the magical number of Osiris is 17,
& you want to see the leverage of this cult into America
their magic,
well what do you call the most magical
top secret secret site in the Continental U.S.?
Area 51
3 X 17 = 51
3 = maximum magnification of the spell, the magic, the control,
17 is their number.
___
In the Bible the # 17 = TOTAL VICTORY! 🕊️
#thetruthisoutthere
In the occult, in witchcraft, in sorcery,
the maximum magnification of a spell is 3 times.
So the witch turns 3 times in the circle to get
the maximum magnification of a spell
or a something that they’re doing.
When the people go into the House of Commons in Europe
& they want to go into the bench & present
they knock 3 times on the door,
& the judge pounds the gavel 3 times.
It’s this magic spell magnification.
When you think of 17 here in America
which is the magical number of Osiris is 17,
& you want to see the leverage of this cult into America
their magic,
well what do you call the most magical
top secret secret site in the Continental U.S.?
Area 51
3 X 17 = 51
3 = maximum magnification of the spell, the magic, the control,
17 is their number.
___
In the Bible the # 17 = TOTAL VICTORY! 🕊️
#thetruthisoutthere
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Fleur Vert
@grenouille9
08 June, 11:27
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
09 June, 12:31
In response Fleur Vert to her Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Water Mark
@Watermark
09 June, 02:43
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
This is a polar coordinate map. It is a 2D representation of a 3D world.
Ask yourself; if this map were accurate, how long would it take to fly from New Zealand to Chile? (for scale, it takes roughly 6 hours to fly NYC to LA)
If the world is a sphere, this is possible. If the world is flat, this is not possible.
(Searched on Expedia a few minutes ago.)
6:30pm - 1:15pm (Nonstop)
Qantas Airways
Entertainment and power on this flight
Hide details
6:30pm - Auckland
Auckland Intl. (AKL)
10h 45m flightQantas Airways 3877 operated by LATAM Airlines Group
BOEING 787-9
Economy/Coach (L)
1:15pm - Santiago
Arturo Merino Benitez (SCL)
Ask yourself; if this map were accurate, how long would it take to fly from New Zealand to Chile? (for scale, it takes roughly 6 hours to fly NYC to LA)
If the world is a sphere, this is possible. If the world is flat, this is not possible.
(Searched on Expedia a few minutes ago.)
6:30pm - 1:15pm (Nonstop)
Qantas Airways
Entertainment and power on this flight
Hide details
6:30pm - Auckland
Auckland Intl. (AKL)
10h 45m flightQantas Airways 3877 operated by LATAM Airlines Group
BOEING 787-9
Economy/Coach (L)
1:15pm - Santiago
Arturo Merino Benitez (SCL)
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Fleur Vert
@grenouille9
10 June, 05:15
In response Water Mark to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Water Mark
@Watermark
12 June, 10:16
In response Fleur Vert to her Publication
Fleur, I fully recognize that NASA and the science establishment has been lying to the world about the world for centuries. I question everything and try to check data before accepting both old and new information.
Most of the FE information on social media is not mathematically sound. There are some notable exceptions and I follow them with interest. (I want to know the truth no matter what it is.)
The basics of Newtonian physics can be proven by simple, at home experiments. Things as simple as, 'why does a salad spinner work?'
When you progress to electromagnetic fields it gets a little more complicated to prove without having electrical measuring tools.
Quantum mechanics, which I believe is inaccurately described with the atomic model, requires both a sophisticated lab and higher level mathematics.
With the possible exception of optical proofs, none of the FE memes or websites I've encountered proves FE.
Most of the FE information on social media is not mathematically sound. There are some notable exceptions and I follow them with interest. (I want to know the truth no matter what it is.)
The basics of Newtonian physics can be proven by simple, at home experiments. Things as simple as, 'why does a salad spinner work?'
When you progress to electromagnetic fields it gets a little more complicated to prove without having electrical measuring tools.
Quantum mechanics, which I believe is inaccurately described with the atomic model, requires both a sophisticated lab and higher level mathematics.
With the possible exception of optical proofs, none of the FE memes or websites I've encountered proves FE.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Fleur Vert
@grenouille9
13 June, 04:33
In response Water Mark to his Publication
So, lets do some laser tests on our earth of realm...
One done in the US and the other one was done in The Netherlands...
In both proofs, the earth appeared to be much much flatter then 'they' told us.
So: earth is far bigger or is it 'worse' and is it flat?
👇
Flat earth proofs
https://rumble.com/vi277j-...
One done in the US and the other one was done in The Netherlands...
In both proofs, the earth appeared to be much much flatter then 'they' told us.
So: earth is far bigger or is it 'worse' and is it flat?
👇
Flat earth proofs
https://rumble.com/vi277j-...
( Warning: Don't watch this, or become a "Flat-Earther". )
"The Greatest Laser Experiment In History" ~ (Content not mine.) One can SEE a thing as truth, as easily as one can DENY a truth. Consent to evil (lies); is in of itself, evil.
https://rumble.com/vi277j--warning-dont-watch-this-or-become-a-flat-earther.-.htmlNotice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Water Mark
@Watermark
22 June, 12:54
In response Fleur Vert to her Publication
I've watched this video previously, Fleur, and found it compelling but not conclusive. No doubt these are some smart people. But light is a funny thing and it bends in non-intuitive ways. They assume that the light from their laser passes through the atmosphere identically as the Sun does. They are also using the parabolic formula for curvature which is only accurate at less that 100 miles. (BTW - this is what is wrong with your SR-71 meme)
For now, I'm thinking they are missing an important variable.
I've watched other optical proofs with telephoto lenses and one using an infrared telescope. I don't have an explanation.
At the same time, these southern hemisphere flights exist. And the only way they could happen is with a globe earth or with hidden technology. For aircraft, I am intimately familiar at a piece part level and can say that there is no hidden tech in commercial aircraft.
Amateur photos of the moon from Antarctica show the features of the moon inverted.
For now, I'm thinking they are missing an important variable.
I've watched other optical proofs with telephoto lenses and one using an infrared telescope. I don't have an explanation.
At the same time, these southern hemisphere flights exist. And the only way they could happen is with a globe earth or with hidden technology. For aircraft, I am intimately familiar at a piece part level and can say that there is no hidden tech in commercial aircraft.
Amateur photos of the moon from Antarctica show the features of the moon inverted.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Fleur Vert
@grenouille9
22 June, 05:23
In response Water Mark to his Publication
The moon photo's from Antarctica: inverted how? Would you please post one?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
These are not perfect proofs of a sphere. Sometime back I watched a video of an iPhone inserting a filter of the moon over an image of a lampshade. The phone thought it was taking a moon photo and inserted a prepackaged image of the moon over the circular, soft white, lamp.
The lies run deep.
With the GPS feature of a phone, the latitude 'corrected' image of the white rabbit could be added to any individual's photograph.
Professional photographers don't use phones for their photos or videos. The shear number of moon photos by people all over the world would seem likely to overcome the iPhone's lies.
On a similar note; if the world was a disc with the sun and moon circling between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn, the people on the far southern latitudes would be seeing the back side of the moon.
I know of no instance of any other moon face showing in any time in history.
The lies run deep.
With the GPS feature of a phone, the latitude 'corrected' image of the white rabbit could be added to any individual's photograph.
Professional photographers don't use phones for their photos or videos. The shear number of moon photos by people all over the world would seem likely to overcome the iPhone's lies.
On a similar note; if the world was a disc with the sun and moon circling between the Tropic of Cancer and the Tropic of Capricorn, the people on the far southern latitudes would be seeing the back side of the moon.
I know of no instance of any other moon face showing in any time in history.
05:56 PM - Jun 22, 2023
(E)
In response Fleur Vert to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Watermark in this post can reply
Fleur Vert
@grenouille9
22 June, 06:22
In response Water Mark to his Publication
Wow, thanks! Yes with the moon you never know what you get. Once saw a moon with 2 dark globe impressions on it. That still puzzles me, because how could that be? One in the left upper and one (bigger) on the under side.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396