17 April, 09:30
@ BrunsonBrothersSCOTUS
PUBLIC OFFICIALS DEVOID OF OATHS OF OFFICE!
Writ Quo Warranto filed with US Attorney in WA DC
Juan O Savin
This is from Ann Vandersteel:
On Friday a bunch of politicians & appointees
had been notified concerning the TAKING OF THE OATH
which is REQUIRED for all office holders
whether elected or appointed —
the documentation showing they had sworn their Oath
& signed & certified it WAS NOT ON FILE.
That they’d been FOIA’d
& could not produce those documents..
The person taking office has to sign under penalty of perjury
that they have taken the Oath & will carry out
the duties of the office & then they sign…
KAMALA HARRIS!! THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
HAS NOT CERTIFIED THAT HER OATH IS DONE.
IF proper documentation is not done within the next 10 days
THEY’RE OUT OF OFFICE
& ANYTHING they have done
UNTIL that documentation is filed correctly Is NOT LEGAL.
They haven’t actually done it 💥
👇 @ AnnVandersteelTruth
PUBLIC OFFICIALS DEVOID OF OATHS OF OFFICE!
Writ Quo Warranto filed with US Attorney in WA DC
Juan O Savin
This is from Ann Vandersteel:
On Friday a bunch of politicians & appointees
had been notified concerning the TAKING OF THE OATH
which is REQUIRED for all office holders
whether elected or appointed —
the documentation showing they had sworn their Oath
& signed & certified it WAS NOT ON FILE.
That they’d been FOIA’d
& could not produce those documents..
The person taking office has to sign under penalty of perjury
that they have taken the Oath & will carry out
the duties of the office & then they sign…
KAMALA HARRIS!! THE VICE-PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
HAS NOT CERTIFIED THAT HER OATH IS DONE.
IF proper documentation is not done within the next 10 days
THEY’RE OUT OF OFFICE
& ANYTHING they have done
UNTIL that documentation is filed correctly Is NOT LEGAL.
They haven’t actually done it 💥
👇 @ AnnVandersteelTruth
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Is it legal if it's done in retrospect? And if so is everything prior still null and void. (or not legal)
09:39 AM - Apr 17, 2023
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Ehcor in this post can reply
Yester Vue
@realyestervue
17 April, 11:10
In response JAde Roiste to her Publication
SCOTUS says fraud vitiates everything. It reverses/overturns judgments and it destroys everything into which it enters. It even breaks the most solemn of oaths, it is a serious crime to the SCOTUS and the founding articles to conduct fraud or crime under the color of law.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
17 April, 09:47
In response JAde Roiste to her Publication
🤷♀️ Just the idea that a whole bunch of Traitors
could be out of office soon
is such a happy thought!
But QTeam is doing EVERYTHING
legally
&
by the book
so we just have to see 😹🇺🇸
could be out of office soon
is such a happy thought!
But QTeam is doing EVERYTHING
legally
&
by the book
so we just have to see 😹🇺🇸
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
