Is Alan Parrot really Durham?

BTW Ezra, in another post you claimed just to be another Anon, you are another anonymous person here seeking the truth.

With all due respect, you are not an Anon just because you are on social media semi-anonymously. You have represented yourself as someone in the know, with reasonably inside knowledge, who having seen it reminds us to "Trust the Plan."

Anons are the peasants of this world, outside the official institutional loop of power. We are all equal because we are all equally outside the support of the halls of power. We are of the people.

But you present yourself as an elite, dropping crumbs for us peasants, at times in a rather condescending way. On one hand you remind people to think for themselves, and at other times, you turn around and tell us to trust you and trust the plan despite the fact that you have at times posted some intentionally misleading things.

You throw out claims, or suggest things about images you put out that you know are not accurate and see how we respond, you test us.LOL Parrot is not Durham just like Durham is not Hercule Poirot.

You should listen to some of Simon Parkes criticism of the messaging of the Q team/military from his Feb 6 video. It is both measured and insightful, friendly criticism, the best kind.

He reminds you people that we are civilians, not soldiers who are supposed to give up all questioning of authority.

There are no "followers" of Q. Only a self-selecting group of people who found a refuge in Q for a life they had already been living in a less organized manner.

We don't take BS from anybody. Especially from people who self-consciously set themselves above us.

A shepherd you come among the "sheep" only to discover that you are amongst other shepherds who don't need a pat on the head, but information that we cannot possibly have access to as civilians.