09 December, 09:28
Good night Patriots!
Sweet dreams of where you want to go next!
Nana needs a nap!
Sweet dreams of where you want to go next!
Nana needs a nap!
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
10 December, 02:44
In response Angels Here -Z to her Publication
12-9-22 💥💥💥AMICUS BRIEF💥💥💥
Re: BRUNSON v ADAMS
Here's a "Print sign 'n send" AMICUS BRIEF
as mentioned by Juan O Savin.
FWIW I think it would be great if they were all personalized/different,
but if you're short on time,
I believe they think this will help the cause.
This version has the initial typos fixed;
double check your version!
https://elijahstreams.com/...
💥PLEASE SEND TO:
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 204543
💥ALSO SEND A COPY TO:
Loy & Raland Brunson
4287 South Harris Blvd.#132
Ogden, UT 84403
Thank you,
~ TX Tulip
💥BRUNSON v ALMA S. ADAMS; et al
http://ralandbrunson.com/H...
💥BRUNSON BROTHERS WEBSITE
https://7discoveries.com
🕊️ "Faith without works is dead."
James 2 : 26
#MiraclesHappen
👇 2 pages
Re: BRUNSON v ADAMS
Here's a "Print sign 'n send" AMICUS BRIEF
as mentioned by Juan O Savin.
FWIW I think it would be great if they were all personalized/different,
but if you're short on time,
I believe they think this will help the cause.
This version has the initial typos fixed;
double check your version!
https://elijahstreams.com/...
💥PLEASE SEND TO:
Supreme Court of the United States
1 First Street, NE
Washington, D.C. 204543
💥ALSO SEND A COPY TO:
Loy & Raland Brunson
4287 South Harris Blvd.#132
Ogden, UT 84403
Thank you,
~ TX Tulip
💥BRUNSON v ALMA S. ADAMS; et al
http://ralandbrunson.com/H...
💥BRUNSON BROTHERS WEBSITE
https://7discoveries.com
🕊️ "Faith without works is dead."
James 2 : 26
#MiraclesHappen
👇 2 pages
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
If these guys appeared on the Johnny Carson Show, then the likelihood of them being controlled opposition raises dramatically.
Their legal argument is strong but the courts have been routinely, flagrantly ignoring law.
I have no faith in SCOTUS.
R v Wade, which we call a win (and is), is likely merely an inflammatory action to keep liberals and conservatives fighting. It also sets up the argument that people don't have absolute rights over their bodies. It's a non-secateurs in that the babies rights are ignored, but libs will use it anyway. This sets up mandatory vax.
Send these letters and make your voices heard, but be prepared for the emotional letdown of SCOTUS scotching this case before awareness of its existence is heard beyond this tight circle of anons.
Their legal argument is strong but the courts have been routinely, flagrantly ignoring law.
I have no faith in SCOTUS.
R v Wade, which we call a win (and is), is likely merely an inflammatory action to keep liberals and conservatives fighting. It also sets up the argument that people don't have absolute rights over their bodies. It's a non-secateurs in that the babies rights are ignored, but libs will use it anyway. This sets up mandatory vax.
Send these letters and make your voices heard, but be prepared for the emotional letdown of SCOTUS scotching this case before awareness of its existence is heard beyond this tight circle of anons.
02:44 PM - Dec 10, 2022
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Watermark in this post can reply