Kat istheSea3 donated @KatistheSea3
01 December, 10:23
12-1-22 JUAN O SAVIN
w/Jason Bermas

https://rumble.com/v1y7ej0...

Juan
16:46 THE SUPREME COURT
ACTUALLY SOUGHT THIS CASE OUT [BRUNSON v ADAMS.]
They asked the brothers, the plaintiffs,
doing it Pro se, without attorneys,
to hurry their case up & get it to em..
SCOTUS members have discussed this case
& because it’s a matter of
National Security on an Emergency basis
here’s the sneaky part:
I’ve gone through this with Constitutional law attorneys..
They said technically
THEY DON’T EVEN HAVE TO LIST IT
THEY CAN TAKE ACTION
WITHIN THE NATIONAL SECURITY FRAMEWORK..
THEY COULD DO IT 💥ANYTIME💥
In other words, the Supreme Court
now has a loaded gun its hand
with a round in the chamber & a full magazine
& it’s pointing it right at the head of the beast,
the heart of the beast.
If they so much as FLINCH
THIS SCOTUS COULD TAKE OUT 388 MEMBERS
OF THE HOUSE & SENATE,
BIDEN, HARRIS & PENCE
IN ONE FELL SWOOP. DONE. OVER IN MINUTES.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Eowyn 777 @Eowyn777
what would be another incident where SCOTUS sought out a case in a time sensitive fashion?
how did they rule?

this seems to either shoot down CONGRESS
or
shoot down Citizens demanding election integrity

Maybe Govt knows the INTENSITY of the PUBLIC on the issue.

KEEP UP THE INTENSITY
FORCE THE ISSUE
02:47 AM - Dec 02, 2022
In response Kat istheSea3 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Eowyn777 in this post can reply

No replys yet!

It seems that this publication does not yet have any comments. In order to respond to this publication from Eowyn 777, click on at the bottom under it