1/5
More Mesa County Misconduct issues.
Several legal concerns and issues would arise if a court scheduled a rushed hearing, issued a temporary order, and had it served via a Sheriff’s Deputy, all while the court should have been aware of a prior dismissal with prejudice.
Legal Issues:
1. Violation of Res Judicata and Dismissal with Prejudice:
Res judicata prevents a party from litigating the same issue after it has been resolved in a prior case. If the court already dismissed the previous case with prejudice, it should not allow new proceedings that are based on the same facts or closely related circumstances.
A dismissal with prejudice is final and prevents re-litigation. The court, including magistrates and clerks, should be aware of this through its case management systems and the previous court records. Proceeding with a new complaint or protection order based on similar facts would likely be improper.

This is not just impressive. This is traits they use to make measures of an intelligence level. So this cat is pre-planning for days/weeks/maybe months ahead of time. That is an incredibly detailed amount of forethought at use for a wild animal.

https://youtube.com/shorts...

https://youtube.com/shorts...

https://www.tiktok.com/t/Z...

We the people against totalitarianisms! Trump's assassins were assets.

P Diddy arrested.

https://x.com/MattWallace8...

That concludes tonight's lessons on how to detect a fraudulent service or order.

Double check anything and everything they try to offer you...and start looking at it BEFORE you reach out a hand for it! Do not accept anything that they will not tell you outright what it is.

Conclusion

A document that is improperly formatted, lacks the necessary judicial and court formalities, or is issued without a proper court process cannot be considered a legitimate court order. Instead, it is akin to an administrative opinion or informal communication from a judge or magistrate, which does not have the same legal weight or enforceability. Proper court orders must go through formal judicial processes and adhere to established procedural requirements to be valid and enforceable.

4/4. Legal Authority and Enforceability

Authority: Only documents that comply with the procedural and formal requirements of court orders have the legal authority to compel actions or enforce judgments. A document that lacks these elements is not a valid court order and does not have the force of law.

Enforceability: An enforceable court order must be properly issued and documented according to legal standards. If a document is merely an administrative opinion or lacks proper judicial endorsement, it cannot be enforced as a court order.

3/4. Requirements for Valid Court Orders

Signature and Seal: The document must be signed by the judge or magistrate and include the court’s seal to confirm its authenticity and authority.

Compliance with Procedural Rules: The order must adhere to the procedural rules set forth by the relevant court or legal system, such as those outlined in the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (C.R.C.P.) or other applicable rules.

2/4. Proper Court Process

For a document to be a legitimate court order, the following steps are typically involved:

Judicial Process: The order must be issued following a formal judicial process, including hearings, trials, or other proceedings where the issues are adjudicated, and the judge or magistrate has jurisdiction over the matter.

Documentary Integrity: The order must be properly documented and recorded. This includes having the order, judge’s signature, and court seal on the same page or as part of a properly bound and paginated document.

Court Records: The order must be entered into the court’s official records and docket. This provides a formal and traceable record of the court’s actions and ensures that the order is properly archived and accessible.

If a document lacks the formal elements required for an official court order, it essentially functions as an administrative opinion rather than a binding legal directive. Here’s a breakdown of why this is the case:
1/4. Court Orders vs. Administrative Opinions

Court Orders: A legitimate court order is the result of a formal judicial process. It is issued by a court after proper procedures, hearings, or trials are conducted, and it must be documented and recorded in compliance with procedural rules. Court orders are binding and enforceable and are the result of judicial authority exercised in a court session.

Administrative Opinions: These are informal statements or documents that may be issued by a judge or magistrate outside of formal court proceedings. Such documents lack the formality and procedural rigor of actual court orders and do not carry the same binding authority. They are not enforceable in the same way as properly issued court orders.

Case Law and Judicial Practice

While specific case law on "Page X of Y" format pagination may not be commonly found, the principle of ensuring document completeness has been recognized in numerous cases. Courts have ruled that documents must be fully intact and not susceptible to alterations. For example:
Peña v. State, 632 P.2d 892 (Colo. 1981): This case emphasizes the importance of proper documentation and the risks of procedural defects. Ensuring that documents are properly formatted, which includes pagination, falls under such procedural safeguards.
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970): This U.S. Supreme Court decision underscored the importance of due process in legal proceedings, which includes ensuring the authenticity and integrity of legal documents.

Evidentiary Standards and Document Completeness

Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) Rule 901(a): This rule governs authentication of documents. Properly paginated documents contribute to their authentication, as they show that the document has not been altered or tampered with. By ensuring that all pages are accounted for, including the total page count, a document can more easily meet the standards of authenticity.

Colorado Rules of Evidence (C.R.E.) Rule 901: Like its federal counterpart, this rule sets forth the requirements for authenticating documents as genuine evidence. Proper pagination helps demonstrate that the document is intact and reliable, aiding in its admissibility.

Rules of Court Procedure and Document Integrity

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP) Rule 5(d) and Rule 11(a) require that pleadings, motions, and other papers submitted to the court be properly formatted and signed. Although these rules don’t specifically mandate page numbering, the requirement for properly filed and formatted documents indirectly supports the idea that they must be clear, organized, and complete, which would logically extend to clear pagination.

Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (C.R.C.P.) Rule 10(d): This rule, which governs the form of pleadings and other documents, requires that documents submitted to the court must be legible, complete, and formatted properly. Though it doesn’t specify page numbering formats, ensuring that the documents are complete would involve proper pagination.

(this one only continued in responses)

Simply numbering the pages sequentially (e.g., "1," "2," "3," etc.) is not sufficient for proper pagination in a legal context. Proper pagination Legal documents typically requires two things:

Sequential Page Numbers: Each page should be numbered in sequence (e.g., 1, 2, 3...).

Total Page Count Reference: The page numbers should also reflect both the specific page number and the total number of pages in the document. This is commonly done in the format “Page X of Y” (e.g., “Page 1 of 5,” “Page 2 of 5”).

This dual format—numbering each page and stating the total number of pages—ensures that the document is complete and that no pages are missing or altered. It makes tampering or fraud much more difficult, as the absence or substitution of any page would be immediately obvious.

Thus, proper pagination looks like: “Page 3 of 10”, not just “Page 3”. This provides an extra layer of integrity to the document.

Paginated refers to the process of numbering the pages of a document in sequential order. In the context of legal documents, pagination ensures that all pages of a document are clearly identified and accounted for, making it difficult for pages to be added, removed, or altered without detection.

In a legal setting, proper pagination means that each page is numbered consecutively (e.g., "Page 1 of 5," "Page 2 of 5," etc.), ensuring that all parts of the document are part of the same cohesive record. This is important for authenticity and to maintain the integrity of court orders, contracts, and other official documents.

In short, pagination helps guarantee that a legal document is complete and in its proper form, and it plays a key role in preventing fraud or tampering.

Legal Citations to Support These Points:

Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 58(a) – Outlines that judgments must be properly entered and set forth in a separate document. Without proper entry and the necessary formalities, the order may be challenged.

Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 13-1-104 – Requires that the seal of the court be affixed to official documents, which includes court orders. Without this seal, the document is not properly authenticated.

Peña v. State, 632 P.2d 892 (Colo. 1981) – Reiterates the importance of due process and proper documentation, emphasizing that procedural irregularities can render a court’s order void or unenforceable.

U.S. Supreme Court Case: Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970) – Provides a broader constitutional foundation for the requirement that all legal orders follow proper due process. This case establishes that procedural defects can result in violations of due process.

Authority of Court Orders and Requirements for Seals

Courts issue orders through their institutional authority, and this authority is manifested through the use of proper seals, signatures, and adherence to formal processes. If a judge or magistrate fails to follow these processes, their actions are without authority, and any such order would not carry the force of law.

C.R.S. § 13-1-104 makes it clear that the seal is not just a formality but a requirement for the court’s authority to be exercised properly. Without the seal, the order may be challenged as illegitimate.
The court’s seal essentially transforms the document from a mere piece of paper into an enforceable legal instrument. Without it, the document cannot be considered a valid court order.

Avoiding Fraudulent Orders

The entire purpose of these procedural safeguards is to prevent the very situation you mentioned: a fraudulent or altered document being passed off as a legitimate court order. By requiring the order, signature, and seal to all appear on the same page, the legal system ensures that each document is a coherent and indivisible whole.

In cases where a second page is improperly attached, it may indicate that someone has tampered with or altered the document, or that the document is incomplete or unauthorized. This is why each page of a multi-page court order, if it exists, should be properly bound, numbered, and sealed in such a way that tampering is obvious.

For instance, if a rubber stamp is used on a second page, it does not authenticate the first page, which could be substituted or altered. A properly sealed document makes such tampering much more difficult and immediately raises red flags if any pages appear suspicious or incorrectly bound.

No Power Without the Court's Seal

Judges and magistrates do not act on their own authority but are instead officers of the court, meaning any authority they have to issue orders derives from the court as an institution. For a court order to carry legal weight, it must follow proper procedures, including the application of the court’s seal.

Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) § 13-1-104 requires that official court orders be authenticated by the seal of the court. This seal is a crucial part of ensuring that the document comes from the court itself, not from an individual acting outside of that authority.

Judges and magistrates cannot simply issue orders from their own authority without following the court's formal procedures, including the seal and signature requirements. If these formalities are not followed, the document is not an official court order and lacks legal force.

Rubber Stamp Seals are Insufficient

A rubber stamp seal, while sometimes used to validate court documents, may not meet the full requirement of authenticity when dealing with final orders. A stamp seal often lacks the permanence and significance of a physically embossed seal or a raised seal, which are usually affixed to more critical documents.

More importantly, any seal or signature applied must correspond with the order itself, and attaching it to a separate page via a rubber stamp without properly sealing the entire document raises significant concerns about tampering or fraud.

A rubber stamp used on a second page would only authenticate the page it appears on, not the entire document. This is why court orders must be properly bound, paginated, and sealed as one complete document to maintain their legal force.

The Order, Signature Block, and Seal Should Be on the Same Page

Under the rules of procedure, including Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (C.R.C.P.) Rule 58, the order must be clearly and officially entered, and it should include the judge's or magistrate’s signature and the court’s seal on the same page as the order. This avoids the possibility of tampering or adding an illegitimate second page that could alter or obscure the order’s meaning.

Challenge Through Due Process:

Under the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments (applicable to Colorado through the Fourteenth Amendment), parties have the right to be subject to only lawful and properly issued court orders. If a court order shows signs of tampering or procedural irregularity (such as an improperly stapled second page), the affected party can challenge the order as violating their constitutional rights to due process.
Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970), supports the idea that due process requires fair and proper procedures, which would include the proper assembly and authentication of legal documents.

Void or Invalid Orders:

An improperly assembled or stapled court order may be challenged as invalid or void, especially if it fails to comply with procedural requirements. Colorado courts have consistently held that orders which lack the appropriate signatures or other formalities may be rendered void or unenforceable.
Case Example: In Peña v. State, 632 P.2d 892 (Colo. 1981), the Colorado Supreme Court emphasized the importance of following procedural due process, especially in matters involving judgments and orders. Orders that fail to meet the required procedural safeguards can be challenged and overturned.

Fraud and Tampering with Public Records:

Any fraudulent alteration of court records, including improperly attaching a second page to an order, could be considered tampering with public records, which is a crime in Colorado.
C.R.S. § 18-5-101(6) defines “forgery” as altering a written instrument with the intent to defraud, and C.R.S. § 18-5-107 defines "criminal impersonation" and other forms of public record tampering.

Colorado Judicial Code of Conduct:

Judges in Colorado must follow the Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct, which requires them to follow proper legal processes, issue orders lawfully, and ensure the authenticity and integrity of court documents. Issuing an order with irregularities such as an improperly attached second page could be considered a violation of ethical obligations.
Canon 2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requires judges to act impartially, competently, and diligently. Any signs of irregularity in the documents they sign could be seen as falling short of these ethical obligations.

Authentication and Seals:

Under C.R.S. § 13-1-104, court orders and judgments in Colorado must be authenticated by the court’s seal to be enforceable. The seal serves as an official mark to validate the order. An order that lacks the seal or where the seal is improperly applied to an incomplete or improperly stapled document raises questions about its authenticity.
C.R.S. § 13-1-104: “The seal of every court shall be affixed to all writs and process issued out of the court.”

Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (C.R.C.P.):

The Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure (especially Rule 58) govern the proper entry of judgments and orders. Orders must be entered into the court’s records and must contain the judge’s or magistrate’s signature to be effective. A court order that lacks the proper signature, seal, or is improperly assembled can be challenged as defective.
C.R.C.P. Rule 58(a): “Every judgment shall be set forth on a separate document. A judgment is effective only when entered in the civil docket as provided in Rule 79(a). Entry of the judgment shall not be delayed for the taxing of costs.”