"The EU parliament just announced a decision that’s causing the fraudulent climate change narrative to self-destruct. “EU parliament backs labeling gas and nuclear investments as green,” reads a Reuters headline from yesterday. “The European Parliament on Wednesday backed EU rules labeling investments in gas and nuclear power plants as climate-friendly,” Reuters continues, explaining that the EU has been plunged into an energy crisis that’s dividing EU nations and forcing a reevaluation on which energy sources are deemed “renewable.”
When this rule is fully adopted, it means Russia’s Putin will become one of the world’s largest exporters of green energy. That also means NATO and Ukraine are engaged in a war against a green energy leader, while western sanctions have blocked Russia’s exports of green energy."
When this rule is fully adopted, it means Russia’s Putin will become one of the world’s largest exporters of green energy. That also means NATO and Ukraine are engaged in a war against a green energy leader, while western sanctions have blocked Russia’s exports of green energy."
EU parliament declares fossil fuel to be “green” energy as climate change narrative self-destructs – NaturalNews.com
The EU parliament just announced a decision that's causing the fraudulent climate change narrative to self-destruct. "EU parliament backs labeling gas and nuclear investments as green," reads a Reuters headline from yesterday. "The European Parliament on Wednesday backed EU rules
https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-07-07-eu-declares-fossil-fuel-to-be-green-energy-climate-change.html
08:09 PM - Jul 07, 2022
Only people mentioned by Duende in this post can reply
David Treciak
@scifiwriter
07 July, 08:29
In response John Atkison to his Publication
Now that we know oil doesn't come from piles of dead dinosaurs buried under the ground and is actually a renewable substance, it's time to change our perception of it. The next energy myth that needs to be addressed is the demonization of carbon dioxide. Trees and plants require it just as we require oxygen to survive. They both play equally vital roles in a balanced ecosystem. And no, the rain forests aren't shrinking. In a recent interview with Tucker Carlson, the president of Brazil set the srecord straight while placing the blame for our misconception where it usually lands, on the eco terrorist wing of the Democrat party.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
John Atkison
@Duende
10 July, 02:55
In response David Treciak to his Publication
I agree.
I've known about oil. One theory is that bacteria (or some other organisms) are constantly creating oil.
CO2 is plant food. It's the "miracle molecule." We should be putting MORE CO2 into the atmosphere. Imagine the increased plant growth across the globe. Gardeners and farmers around the world would love it.
Randall Carlson did an interview a while back where he listed the amount of CO2 available or in reserves. Amounts are in Gigatons (Billions of tons).
1. Human Emissions: 5.5
(I think this is way too low, it's more like 32 Gigatons annually)
2. Atmosphere: 750 – 800
3. Plants: 610
4. Soil: 1,500
5. Fossil Fuel: 4,000 – 5,000
6. Ocean: 38,000
7. Marine Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: 100,000,000
(Comment 1 of 2)
I've known about oil. One theory is that bacteria (or some other organisms) are constantly creating oil.
CO2 is plant food. It's the "miracle molecule." We should be putting MORE CO2 into the atmosphere. Imagine the increased plant growth across the globe. Gardeners and farmers around the world would love it.
Randall Carlson did an interview a while back where he listed the amount of CO2 available or in reserves. Amounts are in Gigatons (Billions of tons).
1. Human Emissions: 5.5
(I think this is way too low, it's more like 32 Gigatons annually)
2. Atmosphere: 750 – 800
3. Plants: 610
4. Soil: 1,500
5. Fossil Fuel: 4,000 – 5,000
6. Ocean: 38,000
7. Marine Sediments and Sedimentary Rocks: 100,000,000
(Comment 1 of 2)
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
John Atkison
@Duende
10 July, 03:04
In response David Treciak to his Publication
(comment 2 of 2)
Now, if you take yearly human emissions of CO2 and divide it by atmospheric CO2 you get .04, which is 4%. That 4% will get gobbled up by plants on land and in the ocean, for example, plankton, in about 15 days.
CO2 makes up about 3.5% and methane and NOx make up 1.5% of total green house gases. The blue whale in the room, making up 95% of greenhouse gases, is Water Vapor. Water vapor absorbs way more infrared energy than CO2. Ever wonder why it doesn't cool off very much at night in humid environments?
Finally, if we look at mankind's contribution to total greenhouse gases, doing the math will reveal that man's yearly output of CO2 amounts to an additional .14 percent (.035 x .04). That's point one four percent.
And to think that people believe that man's CO2 emissions will result in catastrophic global warming. SMH.
Now, if you take yearly human emissions of CO2 and divide it by atmospheric CO2 you get .04, which is 4%. That 4% will get gobbled up by plants on land and in the ocean, for example, plankton, in about 15 days.
CO2 makes up about 3.5% and methane and NOx make up 1.5% of total green house gases. The blue whale in the room, making up 95% of greenhouse gases, is Water Vapor. Water vapor absorbs way more infrared energy than CO2. Ever wonder why it doesn't cool off very much at night in humid environments?
Finally, if we look at mankind's contribution to total greenhouse gases, doing the math will reveal that man's yearly output of CO2 amounts to an additional .14 percent (.035 x .04). That's point one four percent.
And to think that people believe that man's CO2 emissions will result in catastrophic global warming. SMH.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
