Interesting report that Dr. Peter McCollough identifies which suggests the risk of ☠️ from the 💉 is greater than the risk of ☠️ from the 🦠. Essentially, it offers such little protection vs. those who didn't get it (absolute risk reduction), that the number of adverse reactions offsets any "benefit".
JOURNAL LINK: https://www.sciencedirect....
Note that the article is focused around children, but Dr. McCollough suggests that the phenomenon is present across all age groups.
JOURNAL LINK: https://www.sciencedirect....
Note that the article is focused around children, but Dr. McCollough suggests that the phenomenon is present across all age groups.
12:25 AM - Oct 18, 2021
Only people mentioned by HereComesDaBQQM in this post can reply
Booms Incoming
@HereComesDaBQQM
18 October, 12:47
In response Booms Incoming to his Publication
Check my math. This video below mirrors what the journal suggests. It uses some old data (the V A E R S numbers + total people with the jab is higher), but the premise is the same since the recovery rate is still ~99%. Also, the ARR for the jab has dropped, I'd imagine.
FYI: the NNV = 1 / ARR.
FYI: the NNV = 1 / ARR.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
