26 August, 11:52
HOLYFUGGINSHIZ 🔥🐉🔥🐉🔥🐉🔥🐉🔥🐉🔥🐉🔥🐉👇
She just killed it!!
This was one of the best testimonials I have heard concerning the C19 vaccine. Straight to the point and right thru the gut!!
She brought up the Tuskegee experiment which was done over a 40 Years period and was an "experiment" that was done on African Americans.👇
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/...
She brought up the fact that the CDC hid data that the MMR vaccine causes autism in children and that African American males have a higher risk of being #Vaxxed .
She just dropped a bomb on every single one of these "Representatives."
Watch this.
She just killed it!!
This was one of the best testimonials I have heard concerning the C19 vaccine. Straight to the point and right thru the gut!!
She brought up the Tuskegee experiment which was done over a 40 Years period and was an "experiment" that was done on African Americans.👇
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/...
She brought up the fact that the CDC hid data that the MMR vaccine causes autism in children and that African American males have a higher risk of being #Vaxxed .
She just dropped a bomb on every single one of these "Representatives."
Watch this.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Dead on accurate and truthful science.
The critical point to bear in mind is that all of the current law is based on vaccines that actually prevented transmission. So it WAS at least somewhat logical to argue that a person would impact the rights of others by refusing to protect themselves and thereby becoming a spreader of disease.
None of these legal precedents for mandating vaccines have any relevance in the case of this treatment, that not only does not prevent illness or transmission, it may actually increase the spread, and is most certainly contributing to the mutation rate that may cause new variants to dominate. Then, with the new variants, the vaccine effect will actually be to make you sicker (ref Antibody dependent enhancement).
It's not new tech, it's based on science that is up to 20 years old, but it was never used before because, in the lab, ALL THE ANIMALS DIED when encountering wild evolved virus strains. No wonder they skipped animal tests this time!
The critical point to bear in mind is that all of the current law is based on vaccines that actually prevented transmission. So it WAS at least somewhat logical to argue that a person would impact the rights of others by refusing to protect themselves and thereby becoming a spreader of disease.
None of these legal precedents for mandating vaccines have any relevance in the case of this treatment, that not only does not prevent illness or transmission, it may actually increase the spread, and is most certainly contributing to the mutation rate that may cause new variants to dominate. Then, with the new variants, the vaccine effect will actually be to make you sicker (ref Antibody dependent enhancement).
It's not new tech, it's based on science that is up to 20 years old, but it was never used before because, in the lab, ALL THE ANIMALS DIED when encountering wild evolved virus strains. No wonder they skipped animal tests this time!
06:43 PM - Aug 26, 2021
In response Carole Parnell to her Publication
Only people mentioned by MicheleJeanne in this post can reply
