Andrew Zebrun III
@AndrewZebrunIII
22 August, 08:14
50,000 doctors and medical professionals signed a declaration calling for lockdowns to be replaced by focused protection of the sick and elderly based on the scientific literature.
The declaration was signed in October 2020 by professors from Harvard, Stanford, Oxford, and Nobel Prize winning scientists who are considered leaders in their fields of epidemiology, virology, public health, vaccines, etc.
What governments and transnational corporations are currently doing to the world has nothing to do with public health or saving lives.
If it was about public health, they wouldn't be censoring scientists at the top of their medical fields at the world's best universities.
If it was about saving lives, every elderly or immuno-compromised person would have been given zinc, zinc ionophores, vitamin d, and other prophylactic medicines in March 2020 based on decades of medical research on RNA viruses and respiratory viruses.
Which leaves the question, why are they doing this❓ h
The declaration was signed in October 2020 by professors from Harvard, Stanford, Oxford, and Nobel Prize winning scientists who are considered leaders in their fields of epidemiology, virology, public health, vaccines, etc.
What governments and transnational corporations are currently doing to the world has nothing to do with public health or saving lives.
If it was about public health, they wouldn't be censoring scientists at the top of their medical fields at the world's best universities.
If it was about saving lives, every elderly or immuno-compromised person would have been given zinc, zinc ionophores, vitamin d, and other prophylactic medicines in March 2020 based on decades of medical research on RNA viruses and respiratory viruses.
Which leaves the question, why are they doing this❓ h
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jon Neville
@jonnevi
23 August, 01:49
In response Andrew Zebrun III to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Andrew Zebrun III
@AndrewZebrunIII
23 August, 04:33
In response Jon Neville to his Publication
>THE INJECTION STILL ISNT APPROVED BY FDA
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
I REPEAT
>IT'S STILL NOT APPROVED BY FDA
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
DONT BELIEVE THE PFIZER SHILLS, THEY'RE TRYING TO MANUFACTURE CONSENT SQvage Dawg, [23.08.21 15:04]
[Forwarded from il Donaldo Trumpo (il Donaldo Trumpo)]
FDA approval is meant to provide "cover" for their Mandates, by the way...
SQvage Dawg, [23.08.21 15:12]
[Forwarded from BigHouse]
I just figured it out and makes total sense now.
Approval of the vaccine 💉 now removes their exemption status from liability lawsuits! 💥💥💥
Get fired or the jab both now will have full recourse!!
Q told you they will crumble under the weight of their own corruption.
https://www.fda.gov/media/...
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
I REPEAT
>IT'S STILL NOT APPROVED BY FDA
🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥
DONT BELIEVE THE PFIZER SHILLS, THEY'RE TRYING TO MANUFACTURE CONSENT SQvage Dawg, [23.08.21 15:04]
[Forwarded from il Donaldo Trumpo (il Donaldo Trumpo)]
FDA approval is meant to provide "cover" for their Mandates, by the way...
SQvage Dawg, [23.08.21 15:12]
[Forwarded from BigHouse]
I just figured it out and makes total sense now.
Approval of the vaccine 💉 now removes their exemption status from liability lawsuits! 💥💥💥
Get fired or the jab both now will have full recourse!!
Q told you they will crumble under the weight of their own corruption.
https://www.fda.gov/media/...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I hear you. I've been writing several comments pointing out that the "vaccines" have not been approved.
Everyone seems to be hung up on the use of the word "approved" on page 2 of the FDA document. What's been approved is the BLA (biologics licensing application) so that Pfizer's German partner, BioNTech, can distribute market the "original" Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine under the name COMINARTY.
Section Y, which starts at the bottom of page 11 and continues into page 12, tells you everything you need to know. To quote...
Y. All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state that:
• This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older; ...
Everyone seems to be hung up on the use of the word "approved" on page 2 of the FDA document. What's been approved is the BLA (biologics licensing application) so that Pfizer's German partner, BioNTech, can distribute market the "original" Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine under the name COMINARTY.
Section Y, which starts at the bottom of page 11 and continues into page 12, tells you everything you need to know. To quote...
Y. All descriptive printed matter, advertising, and promotional material relating to the use of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID‐19 Vaccine clearly and conspicuously shall state that:
• This product has not been approved or licensed by FDA, but has been authorized for emergency use by FDA, under an EUA to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 12 years of age and older; ...
05:36 PM - Aug 23, 2021
In response Andrew Zebrun III to his Publication
Only people mentioned by Duende in this post can reply
