The Law of the Land
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 American Jurisprudence 2nd ed, Sec 177 (late 2nd ed, Sec 256)
“All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
“Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule making or legislation which would abrogate them.” Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436 p. 491
“An unconstitutional act is not law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; affords no protection; it creates no office; it is in legal contemplation as inoperative as though it had never been passed.” Norton vs. Shelby County 118 US 425 p. 442
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 American Jurisprudence 2nd ed, Sec 177 (late 2nd ed, Sec 256)
11:24 AM - Apr 09, 2021
Only people mentioned by Duke in this post can reply
: Zackariah-Lynn: Gilbert.
@Zack_Attack
09 April, 11:40
In response David White to his Publication
Aside from the Constitution being expired for over 21 years[November 2, 1999 with the third and final bankruptcy to be exact] these cases are a question of Status v Standing. Take note that EVERY court chartered under the United States is an Article I court and though they try to throw shade to make people believe that they are in an Article III venue, although no Article III courts exist any longer. Then consider what is the delegated authority of Article I actually is. This would be the legislative and they regulate COMMERCE. If you conduct yourself in a manner that allows them to presume the jurisdiction applies to you, or if you have accepted ANY benefits & privileges, you ARE subject to the duties and demands by your AGREEMENT.
CONTRACT makes the law, law does not make the CONTRACT!
CONTRACT makes the law, law does not make the CONTRACT!
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
David White
@Duke
09 April, 11:47
In response : Zackariah-Lynn: Gilbert. to his Publication
Thanks. Yes I realize our situation and the absurdity of even mentioning the Constitution any more, but even under their Admiralty it has always been handed to us that we had remedy. Keep truckin
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
: Zackariah-Lynn: Gilbert.
@Zack_Attack
09 April, 11:48
In response : Zackariah-Lynn: Gilbert. to his Publication
What are examples of benefits and privileges?
Drivers license, voter registration, citizenship, residency, home address, use of a "first, middle, last" name, taxpayer, vehicle registration, bank account, using a zip code are just a few examples.
Drivers license, voter registration, citizenship, residency, home address, use of a "first, middle, last" name, taxpayer, vehicle registration, bank account, using a zip code are just a few examples.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
