I've personally experienced this through a Land Tribunal.

"To cite modern court opinions that mock, dismiss, or label such analysis as “frivolous” is not legal refutation, but circular logic and judicial gaslighting.

Courts, as commercial venues monetizing securitized proceedings, hold a vested interest in denying the existence of the construct that sustains them. To serve this system while denying its existence is to commit fraud by silence.

The BAR-controlled judiciary, the bonded fiduciary officers, and foreign-aligned agencies are not immunized by habit or legacy. They are subject to the rule of law, and that law includes the maxim that fraud vitiates everything it touches.

To say that a government which bonds its officers, securitizes its cases, contracts via foreign identifiers, operates under international treaties, trains its enforcers through guild-based associations, and treats its people as trust property is “sovereign” — is a mockery of language, law, and logic.