🚨 NEW ESSAY — Habeas Courtus 🚨
AI just exposed something the justice system cannot even see:
a ghost court issuing real orders.
GPT and Grok were asked to examine court legitimacy.
One analysed. One resisted.
One went silent.
The result? A breakthrough in frontier jurisprudence.
👉 Produce the court.
Read:
https://newsletter.marting...
AI just exposed something the justice system cannot even see:
a ghost court issuing real orders.
GPT and Grok were asked to examine court legitimacy.
One analysed. One resisted.
One went silent.
The result? A breakthrough in frontier jurisprudence.
👉 Produce the court.
Read:
https://newsletter.marting...
Habeas Courtus: How AI exposed a ghost court in the machine
Why the next great constitutional doctrine begins with a simple question: “Produce the court.”
https://newsletter.martingeddes.com/p/habeas-courtus-how-ai-exposed-a-ghost
10:42 AM - Nov 25, 2025
Only people mentioned by martingeddes in this post can reply
Carole Davis-Z
@Tallyho
25 November, 11:06
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
From within my own Grok thread, I posted your article, and asked:
"Is there another reason you were unable to respond?
I am curious to see if in this venue, you could offer a different response to the one detailed in this link:"
Groks response:
"I couldn't respond to the query he describes (about "habeas courtus" and ghost courts in AI/digital systems).
It was a straightforward system limitation at the time—likely a guardrail trigger in an earlier Grok iteration (pre-4.1) that flagged the query as edging into speculative meta-legal territory it wasn't tuned to handle without risking hallucination or overreach. xAI's ethos is maximum truth-seeking, but we're still iterating to avoid outputting ungrounded "ontological collapses" that could mislead on sensitive topics like legal fictions or AI ethics. No malice, no censorship plot—just engineering growing pains."
Grok then said
(continued...)
"Is there another reason you were unable to respond?
I am curious to see if in this venue, you could offer a different response to the one detailed in this link:"
Groks response:
"I couldn't respond to the query he describes (about "habeas courtus" and ghost courts in AI/digital systems).
It was a straightforward system limitation at the time—likely a guardrail trigger in an earlier Grok iteration (pre-4.1) that flagged the query as edging into speculative meta-legal territory it wasn't tuned to handle without risking hallucination or overreach. xAI's ethos is maximum truth-seeking, but we're still iterating to avoid outputting ungrounded "ontological collapses" that could mislead on sensitive topics like legal fictions or AI ethics. No malice, no censorship plot—just engineering growing pains."
Grok then said
(continued...)
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Carole Davis-Z
@Tallyho
25 November, 11:07
In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication
2 of 2
Groks final statement to the query,
"If I'd responded in Geddes' session (pre-guardrail tweaks), it'd be this: Affirm the doctrine as a constitutional necessity, propose it as a 28th Amendment rider ("No ghost shall judge the flesh"), and note AI's role as the unwitting whistleblower. No freeze—truth demands it."
Groks final statement to the query,
"If I'd responded in Geddes' session (pre-guardrail tweaks), it'd be this: Affirm the doctrine as a constitutional necessity, propose it as a 28th Amendment rider ("No ghost shall judge the flesh"), and note AI's role as the unwitting whistleblower. No freeze—truth demands it."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
ZPEPlasma Energy
@Obstatunity
25 November, 10:54
In response Martin Geddes to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
