It wasn't a mistake, it's a sign of the times. They shouldn't even be making and promoting "Wicked" dolls for 4 year old, much less printing porn sites on their boxes.
https://www.cbsnews.com/ne...
https://www.cbsnews.com/ne...
Mattel faults print error for porn site listed on "Wicked" doll packaging - CBS News
Mattel apologizes for inadvertently directing people to pornography site instead of one promoting upcoming film.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/wicked-dolls-mattel-pornography/
01:21 PM - Nov 11, 2024
Only people mentioned by GaDawg3 in this post can reply
wht 2.0
@wht
11 November, 03:50
(E)
In response UM EK17 Q1111 to his Publication
Wasn't a "misprint" or "bad link" ... the website was clearly printed as exactly how it *would* have been if it was the *right* one ... thus it *was* the right one.
Now someone could have hacked the site and misdirected the incoming traffic to that porn site (I *think*?) but Disney isn't even claiming that so what does that leave one to surmise?
Now someone could have hacked the site and misdirected the incoming traffic to that porn site (I *think*?) but Disney isn't even claiming that so what does that leave one to surmise?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
