So I've heard this but can not find proof of this. I can see the correlation between the patent on the vaxs but when put in a human I have not seen proof of this supreme court ruling. It may be out there but it's being hidden. If anyone has more facts on linking these two I'd like to have it.

"Genetically modified mRNA's are legally trans-human" "they do not enjoy any human or other rights as a state""this applies world wide because gen point technology patents are under US jurisdiction and law."

Can someone explain the legal jargon she's using to me in 101.

https://www.facebook.com/s...

While I cannot help you with legal proof because it doesn't interest me that much as I am not vaxed and can't do anything to help those who are I can give you an opinion. I do believe the proof is available as I have seen other people post and talk about this for at least 2 years.
Basically, it comes down to the fact that they put their product in you, which changes your DNA. Because the person no longer has their original human DNA they now legally belong the people that patented that product. (In their crazy minds, I do not endorse this).
Let's hope we never see this go any further.

No proof here either, but have heard the same explanation. Anything that can be generically changed (GMO seeds) can be patented. Nature/natural can not be patented, but if something is changed from original blueprint by man, they stamp it with a patent and barcode.