I think people need to take another look at the Ashli Babbitt incident which was in my opinion after studying it pretty closely, was a false flag.
https://www.bitchute.com/v...

I think it was fake too but what I don't understand is what the *purpose* of it was?

*Why* was it done?
Who's interests or narrative did it serve?

You'd think that would be more clear cut?

Unless I'm just not seeing it

What I think is that they wanted to be able to paint Trump supporters and wild door charging terrorists, just like Antifa- Turn the tables on us. Why did they all go to that specific location? Did any real Trump supporter plan on charging the speaker of the house's office? I think the PB's were in on the deception, too. I mean what Trump supporter thinks that they are helping the cause by marching and chanting "F Antifa" while Trump is in the middle of his speech? And my other question is where were all the usual leftists that day who usually show up and try to wreak havoc? (Answer- gathered at the Capitol hours before Trump's speech, setting the trap by taking down signs and fencing and by establishing some kind of narrative that they were against the cops). When Trump delayed his speech by and hour, it exposed them because they had to improvise for an hour before the real Trump supporters finally got there.

It just seems weird they'd set up such an elaborate hoax to justify "shooting" an unarmed (even) "Trump terrorist".
It just seemed to have blackened them more than the other way around.
The whole thing was strange.

It must not have worked out as planned. I agree with you that that aspect of it doesn't make any sense. What did you think of that video?

Didn't watch the one you put up but a very detailed freeze frame/slo-mo study of it came out maybe a couple of years ago now. Hard to dismiss all the inexplicable actions and psuedo commotion that just didn't make any sense in context.