Doq Holliday
@doqholliday
11 February, 06:14
Showing child porn online is not free speech.
It's against the law.
In a matter of seconds, @administrator 's last many years of hardwork could be gone and he could be in trouble too.
Why risk that?
Does reposting graphic images of children help solve the problem?
Does reposting CP make you honorable and helpful towards fighting against child trafficking?
Best thing IMO to fight it is to spread the word without the disgusting imagery.
Also, go offline. Usually sketchy people and places in the real world are connected to this mess. Investigate these people undercover then
It's against the law.
In a matter of seconds, @administrator 's last many years of hardwork could be gone and he could be in trouble too.
Why risk that?
Does reposting graphic images of children help solve the problem?
Does reposting CP make you honorable and helpful towards fighting against child trafficking?
Best thing IMO to fight it is to spread the word without the disgusting imagery.
Also, go offline. Usually sketchy people and places in the real world are connected to this mess. Investigate these people undercover then
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Yes its illegal to post images exposed today by a certain very creditable, well intended anon.YES the photos were EXTREMELY effective impact, NO words could bring the same result. The photos are extremely disturbing but completely relevant. Worse than:photos of the dog trade Asia where dogs are skinned alive,allowed to suffer for 48 hours before they actually die a painful death. Worse than dogs taken paw by paw whiles still alive & suffering for what? Sweet & sour sauce? some of the photos posted today were worse (THINK Baby),some: soft porn stupiidity of the over priveledged (Hunter lap top)
12:11 AM - Feb 12, 2021
In response Doq Holliday to his Publication
Only people mentioned by HavingFits in this post can reply
