Juris Prudence Civilis
@corpus
07 March, 05:35
So, if the Vatican has all and every book of consequence and kept them hidden (or destroyed) for centuries, why then have they allowed both the Old and New testament to exist?
Could it be that these two are a pack of lies also and they have deceived Christians into believing the biggest lie of all time.???
Because the more I research, the more I am discovering that this is a distinct possibility.
Maybe too, thats why so many are eager to keep posting about "This is going to be Biblical"-----just taking the p!ss, yet again out of Christians who believe in both books.
Just a thought.
Could it be that these two are a pack of lies also and they have deceived Christians into believing the biggest lie of all time.???
Because the more I research, the more I am discovering that this is a distinct possibility.
Maybe too, thats why so many are eager to keep posting about "This is going to be Biblical"-----just taking the p!ss, yet again out of Christians who believe in both books.
Just a thought.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
No, the friggin catholic church is the one who wouldn't let people read the Bible in the first place. They lost control of that in the 1500s so now if anyone forbids you read it, it'll make you want to read it more. So they don't forbid it. They make people fucking stupid so they won't understand it instead
05:59 AM - Mar 07, 2024
In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication
Only people mentioned by YankeeCarolyn in this post can reply
Juris Prudence Civilis
@corpus
07 March, 06:56
In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication
Question:
When the popes were treated as more powerful than kings why was the common man not allowed to read the bible?
Answer:
For starters, up until the relative modern era the “common man” would not have been literate enough to read the Bible even in the vernacular. There would have been no reason to prohibit the reading of something that most people couldn’t read.
Secondly, the reading of the Bible was never prohibited. Certain translations that were considered heretical or that contained anti-Catholic commentaries were prohibited but those who were able to read an authorized translation were never forbidden to read the Bible.
https://www.catholic.com/q...
When the popes were treated as more powerful than kings why was the common man not allowed to read the bible?
Answer:
For starters, up until the relative modern era the “common man” would not have been literate enough to read the Bible even in the vernacular. There would have been no reason to prohibit the reading of something that most people couldn’t read.
Secondly, the reading of the Bible was never prohibited. Certain translations that were considered heretical or that contained anti-Catholic commentaries were prohibited but those who were able to read an authorized translation were never forbidden to read the Bible.
https://www.catholic.com/q...
Did the Church Forbid People from Reading the Bible? | Catholic Answers Q&A
For starters, up until the relative modern era the &...
https://www.catholic.com/qa/did-the-church-forbid-people-from-reading-the-bibleNotice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Yankee Carolyn
@YankeeCarolyn
07 March, 08:33
(E)
In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication
Wrong.
History proves this to you.
Who the fuck wrote this bullshit?
History proves this to you.
Who the fuck wrote this bullshit?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Yankee Carolyn
@YankeeCarolyn
07 March, 08:35
In response Juris Prudence Civilis to her Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Christopher Gibbons
@ChristopherGibbons
07 March, 06:55
In response Yankee Carolyn to her Publication
I am completely aware of the corruption of the Bible. We all know there are many different version and nothing seems entirely too consistent.
I know I had posted some Biblical quotes as it brings me peace to be closer to God and Jesus. Plus, it feels like a constant reminder.
Does posting the Bible quotes makes me demonic? Notices that I do not post everyday, let alone constantly reposting.
I know I had posted some Biblical quotes as it brings me peace to be closer to God and Jesus. Plus, it feels like a constant reminder.
Does posting the Bible quotes makes me demonic? Notices that I do not post everyday, let alone constantly reposting.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Yankee Carolyn
@YankeeCarolyn
07 March, 08:49
In response Christopher Gibbons to his Publication
What?
NO
That's polar opposite of what i'm saying
The Bible is a collection of prophetic scripture
Invaluable, insightful, written by God through the prophets
It's corruption has come in THESE times, now, with certain LGBQT+ type versions
The old ones are easily figured out with simple etymological searches
NO
That's polar opposite of what i'm saying
The Bible is a collection of prophetic scripture
Invaluable, insightful, written by God through the prophets
It's corruption has come in THESE times, now, with certain LGBQT+ type versions
The old ones are easily figured out with simple etymological searches
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
