UM EK17 Q1111
@GaDawg3
14 February, 08:23
Donald Trump addresses false theories about Kamala Harris' eligibility to be Vice President - YouTube
Subscribe to the Evening Standard on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7RQon_YwCnp_LbPtEwW65w?sub_confirmation=1Donald Trump has fuelled racist cons...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Carole Davis-Z
@Tallyho
14 February, 08:29
In response UM EK17 Q1111 to his Publication
From the gov web site - for whatever reason AU will not let me post it as a reply to a comment, so I have had to copy the text from it instead.
"Constitutional requirements for presidential candidates
Candidates for president of the United States must meet basic requirements. Learn about the criteria to run for president.
The U.S. Constitution states that the president must:
Be a natural-born citizen of the United States
Be at least 35 years old
Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years
Anyone who meets these requirements can declare their candidacy for president. Once a candidate raises or spends more than $5,000 for their campaign, they must register with the Federal Election Commission. That includes naming a principal campaign committee to raise and spend campaign funds."
"Constitutional requirements for presidential candidates
Candidates for president of the United States must meet basic requirements. Learn about the criteria to run for president.
The U.S. Constitution states that the president must:
Be a natural-born citizen of the United States
Be at least 35 years old
Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years
Anyone who meets these requirements can declare their candidacy for president. Once a candidate raises or spends more than $5,000 for their campaign, they must register with the Federal Election Commission. That includes naming a principal campaign committee to raise and spend campaign funds."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
UM EK17 Q1111
@GaDawg3
14 February, 08:39
In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication
"The fact that Senator Kamala Harris has just been named the vice presidential running mate for presumptive Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden has some questioning her eligibility for the position. The 12th Amendment provides that "no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States." And Article II of the Constitution specifies that "[n]o person except a natural born citizen...shall be eligible to the office of President." Her father was (and is) a Jamaican national, her mother was from India, and neither was a naturalized U.S. citizen at the time of Harris' birth in 1964. That, according to these commentators, makes her not a "natural born citizen"—and therefore ineligible for the office of the president and, hence, ineligible for the office of the vice president."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Carole Davis-Z
@Tallyho
14 February, 09:05
In response UM EK17 Q1111 to his Publication
Natural born means born on American soil, not naturalized
The anchor babies of illegals are natural born US citizens - this is why they come over while pregnant.
That baby has all the rights of a US citizen... including being eligible to run for Pres once 35, and sponsoring their entire bloody family in, legally..
Harris is eligible because she was born on American soil.
I suspect they will kill her off, because Hildabeast is still salivating in the wings, to start WW3 with Russia.
The anchor babies of illegals are natural born US citizens - this is why they come over while pregnant.
That baby has all the rights of a US citizen... including being eligible to run for Pres once 35, and sponsoring their entire bloody family in, legally..
Harris is eligible because she was born on American soil.
I suspect they will kill her off, because Hildabeast is still salivating in the wings, to start WW3 with Russia.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
That was meant for slaves and slaves alone. Not every foreigner or illegal who has a baby on American soil. They were not American citizens at the time of her birth therefore nor is she. The "law" (constiturion) has been raped, pilaged and plundered by Marxist globalists, just like everything else. She is not eligible. Nor was Obama.
09:09 AM - Feb 14, 2024
(E)
In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication
Only people mentioned by GaDawg3 in this post can reply
Carole Davis-Z
@Tallyho
14 February, 09:14
(E)
In response UM EK17 Q1111 to his Publication
Fraid not.
If you are born on US soil, you are considered an American citizen.
"Birthright citizenship, or jus soli, is the principle that a person born in a country is automatically a citizen of that country. The United States is one of 33 countries, including Canada, that recognize citizenship based on place of birth. (We also recognize citizenship if one is born to a U.S. parent, regardless of where the birth occurred, under certain circumstances.) The concept of birthright citizenship was not always the case in the U.S. but became the law of the land with the ratification of the 14th Amendment. The Constitution now requires that:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
https://www.scu.edu/ethics...
If you are born on US soil, you are considered an American citizen.
"Birthright citizenship, or jus soli, is the principle that a person born in a country is automatically a citizen of that country. The United States is one of 33 countries, including Canada, that recognize citizenship based on place of birth. (We also recognize citizenship if one is born to a U.S. parent, regardless of where the birth occurred, under certain circumstances.) The concept of birthright citizenship was not always the case in the U.S. but became the law of the land with the ratification of the 14th Amendment. The Constitution now requires that:
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
https://www.scu.edu/ethics...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
UM EK17 Q1111
@GaDawg3
14 February, 09:21
(E)
In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication
No she is not. Not under the original 1789 constitution. That is under the Fraudulent Corporate Constitution. The one we are fighting against. The one that created the FED, FBI and CIA. That would make any baby born to the millions of illegals that crossed the past 3 years eligible. It does not. Not as the founders saw it.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
UM EK17 Q1111
@GaDawg3
14 February, 09:28
(E)
In response Carole Davis-Z to her Publication
In essence, this Act formed the corporation known as THE UNITED STATES. Note the capitalization, because it is important. This corporation, owned by foreign interests, moved right in and shoved the original “organic” version of the Constitution into a dusty corner. With the “Act of 1871,” our Constitution was defaced in the sense that the title was block-capitalized and the word “for” was changed to the word “of” in the title. The original Constitution drafted by the Founding Fathers, was written in this manner:
“The Constitution for the united states of America”.
The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
https://www.thelibertybeac...
“The Constitution for the united states of America”.
The altered version reads: “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”. It is the corporate constitution. It is NOT the same document you might think it is. The corporate constitution operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it is the same parchment that governs the Republic. It absolutely is not.
https://www.thelibertybeac...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
