03 January, 10:24
Really makes sense now. They are using the Aether when flying. The LYING will always keep ppl as sheep, until ppl think outside the box & connect the dots.
https://x.com/JackStr42679...
https://x.com/JackStr42679...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
To conceal a conspiracy about fuel usage in airlines; the in and out metering and logs of every fuel pump at every refinery, at every distribution depot, on every truck, and on every aircraft would have to be tampered with (in unison) all around the world. There is no way that has happened.
A trucker can feel the weight of the trailer he's pulling by how the machine responds. A pilot can feel an aircraft's performance as well. Weight and balance is a HUGE thing for aircraft performance and safety.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w...
https://www.boeing-747.com...
(Yes, wiki and Boeing are cabal but these stats are completely generic and confirmable.)
A 60k gal tank is 27.1' in dia. with a sq. footage of: 85.1. At 14.2' tall this gives 1,208 cu ft.
A 747 wing has sq. footage of: 5,960. A ball park guess is that only 70 percent is fuel storage giving: 4,172 sq ft.
A wing would only need to be 3.5' tall.
A trucker can feel the weight of the trailer he's pulling by how the machine responds. A pilot can feel an aircraft's performance as well. Weight and balance is a HUGE thing for aircraft performance and safety.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w...
https://www.boeing-747.com...
(Yes, wiki and Boeing are cabal but these stats are completely generic and confirmable.)
A 60k gal tank is 27.1' in dia. with a sq. footage of: 85.1. At 14.2' tall this gives 1,208 cu ft.
A 747 wing has sq. footage of: 5,960. A ball park guess is that only 70 percent is fuel storage giving: 4,172 sq ft.
A wing would only need to be 3.5' tall.
01:10 PM - Jan 03, 2024
In response LIBERTY JUSTICE4ALL to her Publication
Only people mentioned by Watermark in this post can reply
Water Mark
@Watermark
03 January, 01:18
In response Water Mark to his Publication
Near the tip a wing is thinner but at the root it is much thicker (and much deeper). Plus, much of the fuel is in the belly, not just the wings.
It all fits. Easily. With room for cargo and passengers.
Aircraft are absolutely incredible feats of engineering. Generations of engineers have refined these ordinary, Newtonian technologies into flying marvels. There is no need to attribute exotic tech to their performance.
It all fits. Easily. With room for cargo and passengers.
Aircraft are absolutely incredible feats of engineering. Generations of engineers have refined these ordinary, Newtonian technologies into flying marvels. There is no need to attribute exotic tech to their performance.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Barry McCockinner
@arjayem
03 January, 01:16
In response Water Mark to his Publication
You make very important points, and conspiracy over this much time is IMPOSSIBLE. I say that to say I have NO IDEA HOW they pulled this ruse off. The Pilots I can understand controlling them, but all the other things involved in air travel that are affected stumps me...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Bootsie 1776
@JHPatriots
03 January, 01:23
In response Barry McCockinner to his Publication
You do realize there are pilots on here. They have spoken about this. How much fuel is being burned on takeoff role vs in cruise at altitude? Why do jets fly up there? How do they manage the fuel? How do you propose that pilots are controlled?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
