777ichae7 777arti77 - Z
@PegasusWarrior
07 February, 10:42
New Research Shocks Scientists: Human Emotion Physically Shapes Reality!
https://www.lifecoachcode....
https://www.lifecoachcode....
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Matt Mitchell
@Mmitchell5682
08 February, 12:59
In response 777ichae7 777arti77 - Z to his Publication
Dear sweet mother of all that is sacred! do you guys ever "test and approve" your resources because this is abysmal at best! Nowhere are you told who performed the study, where it was performed and what was their methodology? Was the experiment replicated by other researchers with predictable outcomes given said methodology? THEY DONT TELL YOU WHO, WHAT, WHERE AND HOW! Doesnt that concern anyone? And if anyone attempts to say science cant be trusted needs to pump the breaks... we shouldnt trust bad science but this cant wvwn bw considered bad science. These are just statements, nothing more.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
777ichae7 777arti77 - Z
@PegasusWarrior
09 February, 10:08
In response Matt Mitchell to his Publication
Try this on for detail. Cell biologist Glen Rein … and IHM Research Director Rollin McCraty conducted a series of experiments in the early 1990s involving DNA and intentionally generated emotions. A decade later interest in these experiments persisted. After numerous requests, McCraty summarized their data and published the results of the research in 2003 in a brief report titled Modulation of DNA Conformation by Heart-Focused Intention.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Matt Mitchell
@Mmitchell5682
10 February, 01:20
In response 777ichae7 777arti77 - Z to his Publication
There has been a correlation between mood/emotions and physical health since the Pre-Socratics. I appreciate that you at least provide an actual study but clearly did not read the article dis you? The article claims that our emotions reform objective reality and alter the objective world around us without evidence. a direct quote states, “Human emotion shapes reality...not just our emotions but reality itself”! That is in the first paragraph... didn't make it that far? Read the article then read my comment in context!
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
777ichae7 777arti77 - Z
@PegasusWarrior
10 February, 03:16
In response Matt Mitchell to his Publication
Yes, I did read the article. I agree it should have been sited.
I will continue to look for the actual science.
Have you reviewed the Princeton PEAR Research?
Or simply wave / partical duality research. There is lots of evidence that our consciousness changes our physical reality.
I will continue to look for the actual science.
Have you reviewed the Princeton PEAR Research?
Or simply wave / partical duality research. There is lots of evidence that our consciousness changes our physical reality.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Matt Mitchell
@Mmitchell5682
10 February, 09:55
In response 777ichae7 777arti77 - Z to his Publication
Additionally, the fact that people doing research and why they conduct the research is of no consequence to me. There is no way one could measure or prove objective realities submission to human emotion. Not in a million years A person with a good attitude will undoubtedly have a better life. internal energy and its influence on the self has been demonstrated. Viktor Frankl and Logos Therapy is an example of what I am referring to. "Mans Search for Meaning" is a seminal work here. But that is not suggesting
objective realities subordination to whether I am happy. Its pure idiocy.
objective realities subordination to whether I am happy. Its pure idiocy.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
777ichae7 777arti77 - Z
@PegasusWarrior
10 February, 10:40
In response Matt Mitchell to his Publication
People who say things like 'there is no way'... Have a limited reality. Period. I hope you choose one day to expand your thinking. Why not take some time and actually study Princeton PEAR. Try thinking about wave particle duality in other terms. The proof is right in front of you. Perhaps it is your limiting beliefs that prevent you from seeing.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Matt Mitchell
@Mmitchell5682
10 February, 12:47
In response 777ichae7 777arti77 - Z to his Publication
by the way, still waiting for you to deal with any of the reasons I provided. Not suprised. A fools religion tends to be devoid of anything more than a strong stock of emotions and gentle pats on the shoulder. The only way for such an idea to be true, that emotions or internal energy has the causal power to effectuate change in objective reality, is if objective reality is illusory and only the mind exists... Solipsism! You can take your time to research and respond but if you have nothing to offer by way of a defeater or scientific refutation, please take a seat and bow out graciously!
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
There is a difference between skeptical and synical.
You seem like an angry person just calling others names, in an effort to maintain your beliefs.
Perhaps you should examine your own perspective.
Did you even look at the items I suggested? Probably not because both of those items have science in spades. Wave particle duality, Princeton PEAR reseach. Or dont look and keep to you synical name calling behaviours. It bothers me not.
You seem like an angry person just calling others names, in an effort to maintain your beliefs.
Perhaps you should examine your own perspective.
Did you even look at the items I suggested? Probably not because both of those items have science in spades. Wave particle duality, Princeton PEAR reseach. Or dont look and keep to you synical name calling behaviours. It bothers me not.
01:29 PM - Feb 10, 2021
In response Matt Mitchell to his Publication
Only people mentioned by PegasusWarrior in this post can reply
Matt Mitchell
@Mmitchell5682
10 February, 01:53
In response 777ichae7 777arti77 - Z to his Publication
I did look. I have been searching for a peer reviewed study on their research and guess what I found..... absolutely nothing. I was utterly shocked. Wired magazine sure liked the idea haha! If that is the basis for your belief then I have nothing for you. My mannerisms are one of incredulity and not of anger. Its just shocking that such speculative “research” is the basis for such confident assertions. But because it’s Princeton, we gotta listen because they would have no vested interest to assert spurious theories. What would be interesting is to see when this research team was given a grant
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
777ichae7 777arti77 - Z
@PegasusWarrior
10 February, 01:58
In response Matt Mitchell to his Publication
I suppose you believe there is not enough published research on Wave partical duality... When light is observed it take one form if not it takes another.... The difference is conscious observation. That is hard science that consciousness changes reality. Believe as you like. You are simply not thinking critically. You have also trapped your growth by bleiving these things impossible and foolish. I feel sorry for you.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
