It sounds like someone did not get informed consent. Just like many who had the gene therapy. That is not on them and why I refuse to mock what I believe are victims or say they should have done their research. It does not matter whether I agree with the choice someone makes or not; I think people that are trained in good clinical practice and the industry need to stand up and explain to others why these situations are crimes and cease to attack victims no matter how different they might be from someone else. When I see these situations, I am concerned these influencers are paid to distract from the actual criminals. Was the person in that video provided all the information about possible adverse events and side effects and what the lifelong care would be including risks, benefits, and costs? Maybe they were. Was their brain fully developed so they could make an informed choice about a lifelong commitment? Were they under duress, coercion, or struggling with any untreated issues?