27 November, 11:22
Anyone have that video clip of Klaus Schwab mentioning some legal ramifications of getting the vaccine? Alluding to Vaxxed could be considered property theory.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
anna justice
@Truth_
28 November, 12:17
In response Vincent Kennedy⍟ to his Publication
The Supreme Court has made a similar ruling re owning altered DNA:
In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 – Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc – the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is ‘a product of nature’. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court wrote that if you were to change a human’s genome by mRNA vaccines (being used currently) then the (altered) genome CAN be patented.
https://wakeupsheeple.net/...
In a Supreme Court case decision in 2013 – Pathology vs Myriad Genetics, Inc – the United States Supreme Court ruled that you cannot patent human DNA as it is ‘a product of nature’. However, at the end of the ruling, the Supreme Court wrote that if you were to change a human’s genome by mRNA vaccines (being used currently) then the (altered) genome CAN be patented.
https://wakeupsheeple.net/...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
IT IS CALLED GAIN OF FUNCTION OF OUR DNA. IT IS ILLEGAL TO ALTER ANY NATURAL ACCURING ELEMENT. ILLEGAL PERIOD. THIS WHOLE WORLD HAS BEEN OUTSIDE OF LEGAL FOR A LONG TIME.
08:16 AM - Nov 28, 2022
In response anna justice to her Publication
Only people mentioned by AFellowHuman in this post can reply
