I totally agree with your concerns about what Trump says regarding these horrible awful experimental jabs. For me, there is no plausible reason why he would promote them knowing the collateral damage that would be done. Someone did post a possible explanation that did make some sense. Perhaps (most likely) he knew there was going to be nefarious jabs and pushed to get one that was the least nefarious out there so that there was an alternative as someone in this thread postulated. Someone else also pointed out that one must consider that each person has free will to make the choice. MY concerns are that 1) people trusted Trump who promoted them, and 2) there was not any good information provided that these were experimental, all the horrible side effects (known because no animal studies ever had survivors), no chance of it ever working as it was supposed to work. With no full information, no real informed consent could be made. I disagree with Trump on this. Still love and fight for him