STL Anon @STLAnon
09 March, 01:32

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Alcyone 777 @Alcyone
09 March, 03:30
In response STL Anon to his Publication
EDTA is used for heavy metal chelation by the medical community. It'ss very effective. It may also grab some minerals while grabbing metals. That is what supplementation is for. Heavy metals on the other hand can reak a lot of havoc on ones health. It has a more interesting side effect, which may be why people are being scared away from it with this, if not for its efficacy with heavy metal detox. Patients on EDTA chelation therapy, who were also scheduled for surgeries to open blocked arteries, were able to cancel them. It was discovered that the EDTA also cleans the plaque out of arteries. Research it for yourselves. I would be more concerned about the GMO soy oil and GMO corn syrup in that sauce. Aspertame is one of the worst food additives. Rumsfeld got it approved with the FDA after it was rejected time and time again for its high toxicity. It was Rat Poison until he decided to make it Americas number one zero calorie sweetner. EDTA is common in Heart Health supplement blends.

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Scott Tuck @rubbertuckie
this is a whole lot of words to describe something that isn't food and isn't needed and that has a history of negative side effects.

saying something is worse isn't and argument.

ingrsting battery acid is worse than aspartame.
10:58 AM - Mar 09, 2021
In response Alcyone 777 to her Publication
Only people mentioned by rubbertuckie in this post can reply
Alcyone 777 @Alcyone
09 March, 02:41
In response Scott Tuck to his Publication
You need to practice with your debating skills Scott or in the least, let me call out your strawman first. Both EDTA and Aspertame are approved as safe food additives by the FDA in limited amounts. Battery acid is not and therefore, your analogy bares no meaningful weight as a comparitive reference making your point mute. On an aside, they claim its used as a preservative. Probably because it absorbs anything with a positive ion such as bacteria, and binds it, making a product that would have otherwise gone rancid by the time it got to you, safer to eat. Why is ANYONE, concerned about eating healthy, eating anything with preservatives in them in the first place? Eww. If you care about your health, the last place you will be eating at is fast food restaurants. You have a lot to learn about wellness and the benefits of a fresh whole foods diet. In the meantime, for anyone concerned about clogging of the arteries from these disgusting fast food diets, look into EDTA. Your welcome.😉

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Scott Tuck @rubbertuckie
09 March, 03:05
In response Alcyone 777 to her Publication
what has the fda done to prove trustworthy? they are the ones that allows all this junk in our food. look at what is in our food compared to other countries.

i get what your saying and i am in total agreeance with you. but you were supporting edta in your original post.

my point is there are a lot of crap in our food thats not healthy. comparing one unhealthy additive to another doesnt matter imo.

we are literally on the same
side here. our food is trash because those chemicals help the bottom line and its a sad situation. no one is eating chicken sauce for their heart.

im sure we agree on this as well. bad is bad regardless if one is worse than the other was the only point i was trying to make.

eating healthy is a hard commitment in this world of ours. it would be easier if people just cared more. we are destroying our bodies for convience.

convience destroys our energy levels. we look for something convient in return. a vicious cycle.

hope this clarifi

Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396