Patriot Wolf
@PatriotWolf22
03 March, 02:37
312 Judges Recuse Themselves In Child Sex Trafficking Case ... Wake Up America! https://www.thebeltwayrepo...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jill Taylor
@Trad55
03 March, 04:33
In response Patriot Wolf to his Publication
It's a big headline but the article doesn't address it. Is it just me?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Patriot Wolf
@PatriotWolf22
03 March, 04:40
In response Jill Taylor to his Publication
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jill Taylor
@Trad55
03 March, 05:08
In response Patriot Wolf to his Publication
Sorry if I was unclear. The definition of the word 'recuse' isn't the issue. There's clearly a racket going on that judges are allowing to continue. I see motions denied to remove a specific person from a case but no judges recusing themselves. Recusal is used when a person in authority has real or inferred conflicts of interest in a given case. A lot of people comment based on the headline but don't actually read the article.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Only people mentioned by PatriotWolf22 in this post can reply
