I respect your opinion... curious what part you felt was counter to scripture?

Thank you how kind.
I have to say so much of it I hardly even know where to start to be honest but right off the bat the common error of separating the last week of Daniel's 70 weeks and projecting it into the future leads to all sorts of problems. There is no logical, grammatical or contextual justification for doing so. That interpretation was created by identified Jesuit scholars tasked w/ disrupting what ALL the early reformers came to agree on (though they so famously disagreed on so many points of doctrine) that their own beloved Roman Catholic Papal church was THE little horn/antichrist/sea beast/Whore of Babylon clearly identified as such by over a dozen detailed verses in the sister prophetic books of Daniel and Revelation.
Using the apocrypha for doctrine leads to all manner of error as well.
Using a tool created by the Luciferian elite to interpret God's Word is so obviously foolish (and dangerous) I don't know how else one should even think about that?