rQy Herman Kellerman
@RoyHermanKellerman
29 January, 02:31
RFK Jr. when asked if he is a conspiracy theorist
“That is a pejorative applied to me mainly to keep me from asking difficult questions…That label was applied to me because I said the Covid vaccines didn't prevent transmission and wouldn't prevent infection when the government was saying it would. Now everybody admits it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said red dye caused cancer and now FDA has acknowledged that and banned it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said fluoride lowered IQ. Last week, 87 studies said there was a direct correlation on IQ loss...
I could go on for about a week."
“That is a pejorative applied to me mainly to keep me from asking difficult questions…That label was applied to me because I said the Covid vaccines didn't prevent transmission and wouldn't prevent infection when the government was saying it would. Now everybody admits it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said red dye caused cancer and now FDA has acknowledged that and banned it. I was called a conspiracy theorist because I said fluoride lowered IQ. Last week, 87 studies said there was a direct correlation on IQ loss...
I could go on for about a week."
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I thought that they were obnoxiously aggressive with him.. it was absolutely hideous watching the level f disresepct. Truely it was 'workplace abuse'...
It's just not ok to model that kind of behaviour in public office.. fine to challenge someone but they took advantage of his speech impediment to undermine how he presented.
Absolutely out of order.
I would absolutely not have been able to stop myself interveining... they all just let it happen.. and that is exactly what happens in the workplace when good people speak out... even those who agree in private remain silent when its time to speak... hence 'the scapegoat'.
Shocking display of liberal workplaces.. they will eat you alive if they get the chance to prove they are right.
It's just not ok to model that kind of behaviour in public office.. fine to challenge someone but they took advantage of his speech impediment to undermine how he presented.
Absolutely out of order.
I would absolutely not have been able to stop myself interveining... they all just let it happen.. and that is exactly what happens in the workplace when good people speak out... even those who agree in private remain silent when its time to speak... hence 'the scapegoat'.
Shocking display of liberal workplaces.. they will eat you alive if they get the chance to prove they are right.
06:27 PM - Jan 29, 2025
In response rQy Herman Kellerman to his Publication
Only people mentioned by antidote528 in this post can reply
