Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
23 October, 12:40
Jews did this...
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
25 October, 12:56
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
Fun fact
A black man was the first *legal* slave owner in America
A black man was the first *legal* slave owner in America
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
25 October, 04:49
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
Yes he was black but he was also a jew
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
25 October, 11:00
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
Interesting.. how do we know that?
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
25 October, 02:24
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
Everything about the slave trade is jewish so when someone posted the black dude owning slaves I researched it. He was a jew
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
25 October, 04:54
(E)
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
His name was Anthony Johnson and was born in Angola, which at that time belonged to Portugal, a primarily Roman Catholic and Protestant country.
According to his Wiki page Johnson became a Roman Catholic.
Unless you can provide other reference there seems to be no evidence of him being a Jew.
Also, I could find no mention that the DeWolf family said in that video to be the most prolific American slave traders based out of Rhode Island were Jews .. or any other religious/ethnic identification .. except their lineage traced back to Balthazar DeWolf, born 1620 in the Netherlands and later immigrated to North America. Not likely they were Jews either.
So apparently not "everything" about the slave trade was "Jewish".
According to his Wiki page Johnson became a Roman Catholic.
Unless you can provide other reference there seems to be no evidence of him being a Jew.
Also, I could find no mention that the DeWolf family said in that video to be the most prolific American slave traders based out of Rhode Island were Jews .. or any other religious/ethnic identification .. except their lineage traced back to Balthazar DeWolf, born 1620 in the Netherlands and later immigrated to North America. Not likely they were Jews either.
So apparently not "everything" about the slave trade was "Jewish".
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
25 October, 06:36
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
FIRST SLAVE OWNER IN THE COLONIES - ANTHONY JOHNSON WAS BLACK
This is quite interesting. If you look at his nose he's definitely not fully African.
Most of the slave ships were owned by the jews
https://www.bitchute.com/v...
This is quite interesting. If you look at his nose he's definitely not fully African.
Most of the slave ships were owned by the jews
https://www.bitchute.com/v...
Bitchute
Bitchute is a video service that prioritizes creators and champions users' freedoms and privacy.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dxpjiyekSc8x/Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
25 October, 08:09
(E)
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
Since there seemed to be more than one portrait or drawing of 'Anthony Johnson' in the video it's not clear to me which one was actually him or if either was.
Aside from that the claims that the slave trade was dominated by Jews seems to be a matter of great scholarly debate from perusing various articles on the subject.
Seems too complex with too much historical bias on all sides involved for me to come to any personal conclusion.
Then again there's the Ashkenazi historical monkey wrench that further complicates all matters 'jewish'.
Aside from that the claims that the slave trade was dominated by Jews seems to be a matter of great scholarly debate from perusing various articles on the subject.
Seems too complex with too much historical bias on all sides involved for me to come to any personal conclusion.
Then again there's the Ashkenazi historical monkey wrench that further complicates all matters 'jewish'.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
25 October, 08:54
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
This one is the one I was talking about.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
wht 2.0
@wht
25 October, 08:58
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
Right but it's unclear from the video once you watch it all the way through if that's really him because there seemed to be different depictions on screen at the same time when he was being discussed
I don't know ... too flimsy to go on imo. Plus his bio says he became a Roman Catholic ... sheesh
I don't know ... too flimsy to go on imo. Plus his bio says he became a Roman Catholic ... sheesh
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
Jean Kilroy⭐
@Jeanie
25 October, 11:09
In response wht 2.0 to his Publication
Roman Catholic is jewdism albeit people don't realize that.
Notice: Undefined index: tg1tga_access in /home/admin/www/anonup.com/themes/default/apps/timeline/post.phtml on line 396
I see .. well that's a complicated subject
Regardless of all the back and forth about who's who in the zoo I stick exclusively w/ what the Bible says and it *clearly* identifies the Roman Catholic Papal church as the seat of Luciferian power on this earth at this time.
People want to say the jews infiltrated the church or took it over or whatever all I know is that the moment the Christian Bishop of Rome ascended the Roman state throne in 538AD, the start of the Roman Catholic Papal church, 'the church' became the prophesied antichrist/beast .. period.
All I need to know.
Imo .. the modern state of Israel, 'the jews' and all the intrigue over a 3rd temple along w/ Islam (a Roman Catholic creation) are a red herring established to distract from the workings of the Papacy in these end times.
Here's an in-depth Biblical study on this question
https://adtv.watch/total-o...
Regardless of all the back and forth about who's who in the zoo I stick exclusively w/ what the Bible says and it *clearly* identifies the Roman Catholic Papal church as the seat of Luciferian power on this earth at this time.
People want to say the jews infiltrated the church or took it over or whatever all I know is that the moment the Christian Bishop of Rome ascended the Roman state throne in 538AD, the start of the Roman Catholic Papal church, 'the church' became the prophesied antichrist/beast .. period.
All I need to know.
Imo .. the modern state of Israel, 'the jews' and all the intrigue over a 3rd temple along w/ Islam (a Roman Catholic creation) are a red herring established to distract from the workings of the Papacy in these end times.
Here's an in-depth Biblical study on this question
https://adtv.watch/total-o...
Who Is The Antichrist? | Amazing Discoveries
Who is the little horn in Daniel 7? Is the little horn the Antichrist? If so, what does the little horn tell us about the Antichrist? Find out in this episode.
https://adtv.watch/total-onslaught/who-is-the-antichrist
11:51 PM - Oct 25, 2024
In response Jean Kilroy⭐ to her Publication
Only people mentioned by wht in this post can reply
